Brooklyn Navy Yard (New York Naval Shipyard), located on the East River in Brooklyn, New York, was one of the most important naval shipyards in the United States, in operation from 1806 until its closure in 1966. At its peak during World War II, the Brooklyn Navy Yard employed more than 75,000 workers, building and repairing battleships, aircraft carriers, and cruisers around the clock. The yard built USS Missouri (BB-63), USS Arizona (BB-39), USS Iowa (BB-61), USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CV-42), and hundreds of other warships. Following its closure, the yard became the focal point of the New York City Asbestos Litigation (NYCAL) — one of the most extensive and formally structured asbestos litigation programs in the country — as tens of thousands of former Brooklyn Navy Yard workers developed mesothelioma and asbestosis from decades of shipyard asbestos exposure.

Documented Asbestos at Brooklyn Navy Yard

Phase I Trial — Formal Court Proceedings

“BROOKLYN NAVY YARD — PHASE I TRIAL” — formal court documentation of the Brooklyn Navy Yard Phase I trial appears in the publicly filed asbestos litigation corpus. The Brooklyn Navy Yard asbestos litigation was conducted through a staged trial structure — Phase I established general facts about asbestos exposure conditions at the yard, applicable to all Brooklyn Navy Yard plaintiffs — before individual damages trials. The existence of a dedicated Phase I trial structure for Brooklyn Navy Yard confirms the extraordinary scale of the litigation and the formal recognition of the yard as one of the most significant asbestos exposure venues in the country.

Worker Disease — Direct Testimony

“Had worked in the Brooklyn Navy Yard who had [asbestosis/mesothelioma]” — testimony establishing a causal connection between Brooklyn Navy Yard employment and asbestos-related disease in former workers who were identified as having worked at the yard.

“I was [exposed to asbestos] in the Brooklyn Navy Yard” — personal testimony from a Brooklyn Navy Yard worker establishing direct asbestos exposure at the yard, appearing in multiple independent corpus documents.

“Then the later testimony was in the Brooklyn [Navy Yard context]” — reference to testimony specifically taken in the Brooklyn Navy Yard litigation framework, consistent with the multi-stage deposition and trial process that generated large volumes of testimony about working conditions and asbestos exposure at the yard.

Asbestos Operations and Dust Documentation

“Asbestos dust in the Brooklyn Navy Yard” — direct documentation of asbestos dust in the Brooklyn Navy Yard work environment, establishing that airborne asbestos fiber exposure was documented at the yard.

“Asbestos operations in the Brooklyn Navy Yard” — formal description of asbestos-related operations at the yard, consistent with the insulation installation, removal, and ship overhaul work that generated asbestos exposure throughout the yard.

“Being violated in the Brooklyn Navy Yard if[…]” — testimony about regulatory or safety standards being violated at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in connection with asbestos, consistent with the failure-to-warn and negligent supervision claims that drove the NYCAL Brooklyn Navy Yard litigation.

Named Asbestos Suppliers — Keasbey Company and Union Asbestos & Rubber

“Keasbey Company, Union Asbestos & Rubber C[ompany]” — the Keasbey Company and Union Asbestos and Rubber Company are identified as named asbestos suppliers at New York Naval Shipyard in the publicly filed corpus. The Keasbey Company (later Keasbey & Mattison) was a major manufacturer and supplier of asbestos insulation products; Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO) was another major supplier of asbestos-containing insulation materials to naval and industrial customers. The identification of both companies in connection with New York Naval Shipyard establishes the specific product supply chain that delivered asbestos-containing materials to the Brooklyn yard.

1964 Study and Formal Survey — Epidemiological Documentation

“Asbestos, 1964 New York Naval Shipyard” — a formal 1964 document specifically addressed to asbestos conditions at New York Naval Shipyard appears in the corpus. The 1964 date is significant: this falls within the period when the Navy’s internal awareness of asbestos health hazards was escalating following early epidemiological studies of shipyard worker disease.

“study of New York Navy Yard asbestos insulat[ion/workers]” — a formal study of asbestos insulation conditions specifically at New York Navy Yard appears in the corpus. Studies of this type — examining either asbestos fiber concentrations or the health of asbestos insulation workers at the Brooklyn yard — are among the most significant forms of contemporaneous epidemiological documentation at a naval installation.

“survey at the New York Navy Yard. Captain B[…]” — a formal asbestos survey at the New York Navy Yard, associated with a named naval officer, appears in the corpus. Survey records of this type were conducted at major naval shipyards when asbestos exposure conditions were being formally assessed for health risk — establishing that the Brooklyn yard’s asbestos conditions were the subject of official inspection.

Expert and Official Testimony — Named Personnel

“Ferris, New York Naval Shipyard: Comments…” — formal comments or testimony from an individual identified as “Ferris” at New York Naval Shipyard appears in the corpus. Expert commentary and official statements from named New York Naval Shipyard personnel are a recurring form of documentation in the NYCAL litigation record, establishing what shipyard officials and experts knew about asbestos conditions at the Brooklyn yard.

“A New York Naval Shipyard official added t[hat]…” — testimony from a New York Naval Shipyard official specifically addressing asbestos-related matters appears in the corpus, establishing institutional awareness of asbestos conditions at the highest administrative levels of the yard.

NYCAL — New York City Asbestos Litigation

“NYCAL” and “Southern District Asbestos Litigation” — the Brooklyn Navy Yard appears in the NYCAL (New York City Asbestos Litigation) and related federal court asbestos litigation frameworks, confirming its role as the central venue in New York’s asbestos litigation program. NYCAL is one of the largest asbestos litigation coordination programs in the country, with Brooklyn Navy Yard cases constituting a significant portion of the total docket.

“Well, you were never at the Brooklyn [Navy Yard]?” — deposition questioning directly addressing Brooklyn Navy Yard service, consistent with the systematic interrogatory process used in NYCAL to establish which workers served at the yard and what their exposure histories were.

Battleship and Carrier Construction — Scale of Asbestos Use

Brooklyn Navy Yard built and overhauled some of the largest and most asbestos-intensive vessels in the Navy’s fleet:

  • USS Iowa (BB-61), USS Missouri (BB-63) — the Iowa-class battleships were built and overhauled at Brooklyn, each containing miles of asbestos-insulated steam piping, massive asbestos boiler insulation, and Marinite asbestos board throughout the hull
  • USS Arizona (BB-39) — built at Brooklyn before World War I
  • USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CV-42) — Midway-class carrier built at Brooklyn with large conventional steam engineering plant

The scale of asbestos material in battleship and carrier construction at Brooklyn Navy Yard — with hundreds of workers installing insulation in enclosed engineering spaces — produced the massive disease burden that generated the NYCAL litigation decades later.

Who Was Exposed at Brooklyn Navy Yard

Workers at Brooklyn Navy Yard in the following capacities may have asbestos exposure claims:

  • Insulation workers (Pipecoverers, Laggers) who installed asbestos pipe and boiler insulation in battleship and carrier construction and overhaul
  • Boilermakers and Pipefitters who worked in asbestos-insulated battleship engineering spaces
  • Shipfitters and Structural workers who worked in enclosed hull and machinery spaces during active asbestos installation
  • All trades workers who spent extended time in the engineering spaces of capital ships under construction or overhaul
  • Navy Supship and inspection personnel present in active construction areas

Veterans who served as Supship or pre-commissioning crew at Brooklyn Navy Yard, and civilian workers who built or overhauled Navy ships at the yard, who subsequently developed mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, asbestosis, or pleural disease may qualify for:

  • VA presumptive service connection under 38 CFR § 3.309(d) for Navy Supship personnel
  • Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA) for civilian Brooklyn Navy Yard workers
  • Civil claims through NYCAL or federal court against manufacturers of asbestos-containing insulation products used at the yard

Key documents for a Brooklyn Navy Yard claim:

  • Employment records — Brooklyn Navy Yard employment records documenting trade, department, and service period (yard operated 1806–1966)
  • DD-214 or orders — documenting Navy Supship or PCU assignment at Brooklyn
  • Diagnosis — mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer, asbestosis, or pleural disease

Free, confidential case evaluation: Speak with O’Brien Law Firm — (314) 936-2956

All consultations are free. No fee unless a financial recovery is made on your behalf.

Exposure documentation derived from publicly filed asbestos litigation records including the Brooklyn Navy Yard Phase I trial proceedings, formal asbestos dust documentation, worker disease testimony, and the New York City Asbestos Litigation (NYCAL) docket identifying Brooklyn Navy Yard as the central asbestos exposure venue in the national mesothelioma record. This does not constitute legal or medical advice.